This week we focused our attention on transformation and translation, or what I seen it as perspective. We started off the on Monday by watching several videos of artists painting. What stuck out to me from all the videos were the painting of the trees. It was interesting to see one of the psychological aspects I learned about actually panning out. Although all the different artists were viewing the exact same tree with all of the same features, each one differed and was unique in their own individual way. Some focused on the trunk, others the leaves, and others even just the background. Zack did a great job tying this into writing by having us do the lens activity. Although every student was looking at the same classroom, when we focused ourselves with our "lenses" we all saw different things. Similarly, with writing and genres, authors could be writing about the same topic and even the same aspect of topic, however the content will differ depending on your own individual viewpoint. The "Everybody Poops" segment in class also further emphasized this topic.
In Wednesdays class, we put those subjects to use by further discussing our WP3. As I wrote in my PB3a, this WP reminded me of my volunteer work that I did during high school in which I pretty much practiced every week without really knowing what I was doing so. As I continued to think back on other projects and things I've done, I realized that writing and the things we're learning in this class from day one is essential to not only college assignments but for life in general.
Sunday, February 28, 2016
PB3A: Transformations
As soon as we began talking about WP3, I related it immediately
to one of the programs I ran in high school. As a Volunteer with a within 4-H
called Youth Experience in Science (YES) my entire position was to take weekly ideas
proposed by the 4-H committee and transform it from a paper with directions
meant for volunteers to read, to both a presentation to teachers for their
approval as well as a lesson plan to implement to 1st-3rd
graders. Similarly, it seems like this assignment is nearly the same thing in
terms of creating something for both a younger and older audience but having
still to present the same ideas.
The article I chose to work with was “Disciplines and
Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge” by Ken Hyland.
The article discusses the aspect of how the interaction between the writer and
reader can change reader’s perception of the topic and how any simple change can
affect the entire piece. For an older audience genre, I am thinking about
creating some sort of consent form that would contain the implications and acknowledgements
of how writers can influence readers and the responsibility of sharing
knowledge with readers. I plan on tailoring the form so it seems like required
paperwork to submit before publishing an opinion article in a magazine or
newspaper. From the academic article, I plan on transforming the information
presented in order to create a new piece with conventions of consent forms. A
few conventions that first come to mind is of course a signature line at the
bottom along with a line to write the date as well as possibly a witness
signature line. As for the actual content of the consent form I have not though
of any specifics, however I know it should contain information about the risks
of writing towards the beginning and a statement of acknowledgement stating
that they have read and understood everything to the best of their ability and
understand their requirements and obligations as writers.
For a younger audience, I am thinking of transforming “Disciplines
and Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge” into the
genre of a motivational/educational poster that are often hung in classrooms from
pre-school till usually the end of high-school. Since this is an academic
subject, a poster in the classroom will still contain the academic writing
aspect as well as still seeming logical. Because many of the aspects discussed in
the article wouldn’t make sense in younger school age children, I plan on
making it targeted toward particularly high-school age students. Transforming a
20-page article to a poster, I will have to keep the content of it somewhat
short and only focus on the main aspects of the article, which understandably may
cause the subject to lose some meaning and context. Also, as a poster meant for
younger audiences, the diction of the poster is going to be drastically different
from the original article. Instead of using large academic English, I plan on
using smaller simpler words in order to make the targeted audience have an easier
time relating to it. Lastly, seeing as posters are meant to engage the
audience, I would plan on inserting some type of visual stimuli to grab the
reader’s attention, most likely something colorful yet not too distracting to
take away from the primary message.
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
THLOG
Week 6
The focus of this weeks classes was style and stylistic moves. These
two classes felt somewhat more engaging because we co vered a lot of tips that
will help me in writing anything from resumes to these blog posts. One of the
most shocking things that I found actually helped a lot was changing the font
to help with the style of writing you are choosing to use. I don’t necessarily
know why it helps but just seeing a more relaxed and flow-y type of font helps
get that type of style out on the screen. Another thing we covered was using
the thesaurus to find more fitting words to place into writing. The example we
used was says but this tool can be
used with pretty much any word. This tool really helped me when writing my
scholarship essays back in high school because when I couldn’t think of the
perfect word I just used a colloquial term to get my point across then went
back to fix it. The most important topic. I believe, we learned this past week
however was the use of hedged language. This aspect of writing is particularly
important because it makes the writer more credible in situations that can
potentially be very ambiguous. I try to practice the use of hedged language as
much as I can when I am not sure of things but still have an opinion on them.
Monday, February 8, 2016
PB2B
The
moves highlighted in green are those from the “They Say I Say” appendix, and those highlights in
blue are ones that I noticed
and named.
- Signaling who’s saying
what
"Devitt
points out, ‘Different grocery stores make for different grocery lists…’” (Dirk)
-
In this relatively easy
move, Dirk, in Navigating Genres, simply writes out the name of the person he
is about to quote. Instead of quoting then writing the name afterwards, Dirk
gives credit to Devitt first which is very effective in clarifying and
confusion of plagiarizing.
- ENTERTAINING
OBJECTIONS
“You
might also argue that intuitive thinking is better enhanced by silent musing;
or going for a walk or sleeping on it or any of a host of other ways to push a
question away from focal attention back to the preconscious…” (Elbow)
-
By entertaining
objections, Elbow makes his thesis and argument stronger. By explaining why his
argument is correct, you simply get your point across, however when using
potential counter arguments, it proves that you are knowledgeable and can
defend your thoughts and ideas.
- Establishing
why Your Claims Matter
“Because
media rhetoric surrounds us, it is important to understand how rhetoric works.” (Carrol)
-
This simple yet
necessary move is essential to anything written. Often overlooked because many
writers think its easily implied, stating why your writing matters to the
reader is one of the first steps to grabbing their attention and getting them
interested. As simple and unnecessary as it may seem, this one short sentence
can your audiences entire understanding of what you write.
- EMBEDDING
VOICE MAKERS
“Here I
offer my definition: Rhetoric is what allows you to write (and speak)
appropriately for a given situation, one that is determined by the expectations
of your audience, Implied or acknowledged, whether you are texting, writing a
love letter, or bleeding a term paper.” (Boyd)
-
Through the use of this
move, a writers own thoughts and feelings are resonated in their writing. A lot
of times your own voice gets lost in translation when trying be a professional
writer and using ‘Academic English’ so this move is particularly important.
This example specifically, Boyd gives a personal definition of the word
rhetoric which sharply contrasts with the ‘academic definition’.
- MAKING
WHAT THEY SAY SOMETHING YOU SAY
“While
I don’t know anything about Corinthian columns…Allen Tate’s metaphor of reading
as if you were an architect is a great way to think about
RLW.” (Bunn)
-
This move, used by Bunn,
is essential to making the entire paper seemingly academic. By using other
sources to support your own ideas, it somewhat implies that what is being said
must be true. This is seen by the popular quote “great minds think alike”. Even
though Bunn honestly states that Allen Tate’s metaphor is totally foreign, the
simple comparison still adds credibility to the piece of work.
- Recappin
“Taking
what Devitt says into account, think back to the previous discussion of the
research paper.” (Dirk)
-
Dirk used a move I call “Recappin”
throughout navigating genres. Dirk always goes back to previous examples once
introducing new information in order to provide new outlooks and viewpoints.
- Thats
truuuue
“I will
admit that the word genre used to have a bad reputation and
may still make some people cringe.” (Dirk)
-
Dirk also uses something
I called “That’s truuuue” in the article as well. By using a sentence that
relates to the readers saying something that a student will understand.
Personally, when I read the sentence, I laughed and agreed. Dirk uses this to relate
to the readers and hook their attention.
- YOU
CAN DO IT
“You
are already an author, and that means you have a built-in advantage when
reading like a writer.” (Bunn)
-
Bunn uses a move I named
“You Can Do it” in most of the article. Throughout the entire piece of work, Bunn
provides positive input to readers to heighten their motivation and self-esteem
to say the lease. By building their confidence, Bunn is trying to emphasize
that anyone can be good writers and most people already are, they just need the
extra push. This move is the most effective in my opinion.
- Look,
I know what I’m talkin bout
“For
example, research has shown that only 2% of women consider themselves
beautiful.” (Carrol)
-
Carrol used a move I named
“Look, I know what I’m talking about” in the piece of work. By using a
statistic, Carrol used ethos, or credibility, to interest readers. By using a
stat by researchers, the professionalism and the educational purpose really
shows and makes the whole piece look better.
- PAY ATTENTION
“How many times have you had reason to ask
these questions?” (Graff)
-
The last move that I found
throughout the readings is something I call “Pay Attention”. Gaff uses this
move I order to keep the reader’s attention. Many times students will read but
not retain anything, but having questions posed in the readings keeps the
readers minds focused and thinking on what’s going on. This particular is also
very useful in writing because you don’t want your writing to not be retained.
Sunday, February 7, 2016
Thlog 5
The quarter is officially
HALFWAY over! Although during classes it feels like it drags on forever,
looking back at the past 5 weeks it has really flew by. The main focus of this
weeks classes was definitely ‘MOVES’. Although it was really confusing in the beginning,
I feel like I am starting to finally understand it a little bit more. What really
helped me understand moves was watching the video of The Rocks ‘Peoples Elbow”.
It helped me see that the move is not only the body slamming but also
everything leading up to it as well, such as the running back and for the and
taunting. Like all moves, the peoples elbow itself is made up from many parts that
come together.
In preparation for
writing project 2 we also did an activity on academic disciplines that related
back to genres. Everyone in class got a topic and 2 disciplines of their choice
and wrote a basic thesis that someone studying that discipline would research
about. While doing this activity it reminded me of the Mark Smith murder
activity about genres we did a few classes back. These two activities both
framed a certain topic to get its purpose across. They both also reminded me of
a type of bias I learned last year in social psychology called confirmation
bias. By only looking for information in your area of study, or only one
specific news station, you may only get part of the information.
This week’s reading was
Mike Bunn’s “Reading like a Writer”, and although his concept was hard as hell
for me to grasp at first, I casually started doing it at the most random times
and with the most random things. For instance, I went to “Chick-fil-A” with
Edwin this past week and when I disgustingly took a bite of a pickle, I started
asking why the hell the creator would decide to add pickles of all things to
chicken. I then began telling Edwin everything else he could have and should have
added instead and how he probably chose pickles because it would be the
cheapest and add the most flavor with the smallest amount. Edwin then replied
that instead of reading like a writer, I was eating like a Chef!
Monday, February 1, 2016
PB2a
When looking into this assignment, I first thought that it
was going to be difficult to find a publication that would interest me.
However, after only my second search, I found “Managing
Anger in Adolescents”, an article by Mary Lowth published in “Practice Nurse”
Vol. 45, Issue 12 in December of 2015. I took interest in this particular
article for two simple reasons. The first, anger is a fascinating concept in
psychology and it is interesting to see how various people define anger and
operationalize the very abstract concept. The second reason I found interest in
this article is because it deals with the area of life which I hope to one day
work with and help, adolescents.
Being a scholarly article, one would definitely expect this
article to have conventions that are specific to the scientific and academic
genres. One of the most prevailing conventions that caught my eye right from
the start was that every time the word ‘anger’ came up, it was bolded. Since
the entire purpose of the article was managing anger, it would make sense to
call attention to every time the word comes up. Another convention that I found
while reading through the paper is the capitalization and use of different
color writing when switching main talking points. This provides a clear
understanding to the reader that the focus of the upcoming section is switching
and lets them know what the new section is going to consist of.
Since this is published on a webpage, there were also many
conventions that are specific to online sources only. One of the more
interesting conventions I found was links on the left hand of the page that
were able to take you to specific parts of article. This convention is useful
in many ways, but primarily I found that it was helpful for when I have already
read it, and wanted to go back to a specific part, so instead of scrolling
through to find it, I just clicked the main section title. Another set of links
that made online reading more convenient was the ‘tags’ section at the end of
the page. This convention not only made it useful when finding the article in the
first place, but it provided a list of clickable words for reading more if
interested. Next to the tags, there was also ‘further reading’, a section that
provided links to more article in relation to anger and adolescents. Lastly, at
the top of the webpage, there was a button that you could click in order to
have the entire page read to you. This convention made comprehending the
article much more convenient since the font size was really small and zooming
in caused the need to scroll back and forth.
Being an article about mental
health, there were many questions posed throughout the entire piece of work.
The main purpose of these questions were to provide background specific to this
area of study. “Is teenage anger a medical problem?” set up the topic for the
entire article. More questions included “What is the problem with anger?”, and
more generally “What is anger?”. The third question posed set up the section
which was used to operationalize the concept of anger. According to Lowth in
this article anger is “a defense mechanism, a
coping mechanism, a means of displacing other difficult emotions, and a
reasonable response in some circumstances.” (Lowth) The
operationalization of anger according to the writer is very vague, understandably
so, because anger is hard to define. The most important aspect of the piece
that struck me was the statement that anger and other mental health issues are
normal. This seemed as the most important based simply on repetition.
Furthermore, there were various sections that provided resources, links, and
advice for those who suffer from anger and other mental health issues.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
