When looking into this assignment, I first thought that it
was going to be difficult to find a publication that would interest me.
However, after only my second search, I found “Managing
Anger in Adolescents”, an article by Mary Lowth published in “Practice Nurse”
Vol. 45, Issue 12 in December of 2015. I took interest in this particular
article for two simple reasons. The first, anger is a fascinating concept in
psychology and it is interesting to see how various people define anger and
operationalize the very abstract concept. The second reason I found interest in
this article is because it deals with the area of life which I hope to one day
work with and help, adolescents.
Being a scholarly article, one would definitely expect this
article to have conventions that are specific to the scientific and academic
genres. One of the most prevailing conventions that caught my eye right from
the start was that every time the word ‘anger’ came up, it was bolded. Since
the entire purpose of the article was managing anger, it would make sense to
call attention to every time the word comes up. Another convention that I found
while reading through the paper is the capitalization and use of different
color writing when switching main talking points. This provides a clear
understanding to the reader that the focus of the upcoming section is switching
and lets them know what the new section is going to consist of.
Since this is published on a webpage, there were also many
conventions that are specific to online sources only. One of the more
interesting conventions I found was links on the left hand of the page that
were able to take you to specific parts of article. This convention is useful
in many ways, but primarily I found that it was helpful for when I have already
read it, and wanted to go back to a specific part, so instead of scrolling
through to find it, I just clicked the main section title. Another set of links
that made online reading more convenient was the ‘tags’ section at the end of
the page. This convention not only made it useful when finding the article in the
first place, but it provided a list of clickable words for reading more if
interested. Next to the tags, there was also ‘further reading’, a section that
provided links to more article in relation to anger and adolescents. Lastly, at
the top of the webpage, there was a button that you could click in order to
have the entire page read to you. This convention made comprehending the
article much more convenient since the font size was really small and zooming
in caused the need to scroll back and forth.
Being an article about mental
health, there were many questions posed throughout the entire piece of work.
The main purpose of these questions were to provide background specific to this
area of study. “Is teenage anger a medical problem?” set up the topic for the
entire article. More questions included “What is the problem with anger?”, and
more generally “What is anger?”. The third question posed set up the section
which was used to operationalize the concept of anger. According to Lowth in
this article anger is “a defense mechanism, a
coping mechanism, a means of displacing other difficult emotions, and a
reasonable response in some circumstances.” (Lowth) The
operationalization of anger according to the writer is very vague, understandably
so, because anger is hard to define. The most important aspect of the piece
that struck me was the statement that anger and other mental health issues are
normal. This seemed as the most important based simply on repetition.
Furthermore, there were various sections that provided resources, links, and
advice for those who suffer from anger and other mental health issues.
Hello Junior,
ReplyDeleteI am glad you found something that interests you personally. I think that just the topic itself already makes the paper/ article ten times better. I am glad that you pointed old the bold words because it kind of times in with what we were just talking about in class. Also I went ahead and looked at the article and checked out the colorful titles you pointed out and I totally see what you mean. I think that was a very smart move with the author himself. I liked how you posed each question and wrote a little about them, that would make other readers understand the article a bit more before they started it. Good Job, keep up the good work.
-Casandra Phillips